The ability to make reasonable estimates is essential in consulting and thus something you are very likely to have to do in your case interview. You interviewer might ask something like:
How many cars are sold in Berlin in one year?
Our client wants to open a pizza restaurant in Rome. How many pizzas should he expect to sell in his first day of activity?
How many people will buy the latest high-end smartphone on the market?
The city of Stuttgart is about to introduce new City Bikes. How many bikes should they buy? How many people will use this service?
Now, there's a small chance you might know the answer to one of these - perhaps you used to live in Berlin and work in the motor industry there. However, the point of such questions is not to assess your knowledge, but rather to test your reasoning.
When confronted with such questions, the idea is that you should work from what knowledge you do have towards a sensible estimation of the correct value.
We can think of an estimation as an "educated guess". However, the word "guess" does not imply plucking an answer purely from the realms of your own imagination. The watchword at every step of an estimation is that what you are doing is reasonable. Even if you somehow got close to the real answer, your interviewer will not be impressed if you cannot demonstrate a sensible rationale for how you arrived at it. In fact, your interviewer will very possibly neither know nor care about the real answer - your capacity to reason is all that they are interested in.
Prep the right wayLearn how to think like a consultant instead of outdated frameworks Learn more
Ostensibly, the idea of providing estimates as to the answers of any of these questions under time pressure and with no external information might seem incredibly daunting. However, in this article we discuss how taking a structured approach allows you to break down the problem and makes these kinds of estimation quite straightforward - you just need to know what you are doing!
It is worth noting that, despite how strange these kinds of question might seem, they are not unique to consulting. Interviewers in many disciplines requiring strong reasoning will frequently give candidates similar problems. In physics, "Fermi" problems (named for Enrico Fermi) - where one might have to estimate the average density of the Earth or the number of atoms in the Great Pyramid at Giza with no additional information - are often used to select candidates with advanced reasoning skills and subsequently to build that capacity during their courses. The takeaway here is that there is a reason why interviewers ask such ostensibly bizarre questions and that you should expect and prepare for them!
We can think of an estimation as resulting from a combination of guessed elements and reasoning/calculation. These guessed elements enter an estimation in the form of assumptions. The presence of assumption is definitive of estimation. One simply cannot have an estimation without making one or more assumptions. Assumptions have a bad name (they famously "make an ass of you and me", right?), and we are used to shying away from them. In other areas, especially in academia, we expend a great deal of effort trying to eliminate assumptions from our reasoning.
However, consultants - as opposed to academics - must always operate within the constraints of the real world - and here the general impossibility of totally complete information makes assumption essential to actually getting anything done.
Assumptions are not the enemy then. By the same token, not all assumptions are created equally. The goal in making assumptions is to simplify reality. Our simplifications don't need to be true, but they do need to be reasonable. For example, we might assume that the German population is divided into families of three people. We already know that this is not true, but that does not mean that it is not a reasonable assumption in the correct context - and one that might be useful in generating a solid estimate. By contrast, the assumption that everyone in the population is 35 years old (even if this is the average age for the region) is unlikely to be a reasonable one, and probably wouldn't help in making a useful estimation.
Ultimately, you will have to use your own judgement in making assumptions. Different cases will address radically different topics, so any exhaustive treatment here is impossible. As ever, you simply have to be reasonable. For instance, addressing the question about car sales in Berlin, if we have already assumed our population is split into families of three people (as above), it would be reasonable to further assume that each family owns one car and that the lifespan of that car is five years.
There are some more generic assumptions which will recur across various cases. In particular, when dealing with normal populations, there are a couple of assumptions which are routinely made in consulting estimations:
Linear distribution of age groups
We assume that there are the same number of people in age brackets of the same width. Thus, we assume that there are the same number of people aged 20-30 as aged 70-80 (this would mean that our "population pyramid" was a perfectly regular column).
Average lifespan is 80 years
We assume that all individuals live for exactly 80 years.
How to tackle estimations
Now we have a little more understanding as to what an estimation is and what is expected of us when making one, it's time to think about how we should actually go about answering this kind of question.
Join thousands of other candidates cracking cases like prosAt MyConsultingCoach we teach you how to solve cases like a consultant Get started
Estimations like the ones listed above can really throw candidates and might seem impossible - especially under the severe time pressure of a case interview. However, there really is no reason to panic. Estimations are generally quite straightforward when approached correctly. A systematic and thoughtful approach will take you a long way to very plausible estimates of seemingly impossible quantities.
In our MCC Academy video lesson on Estimates and Segmentation, we take you in some detail through a step-by-step method for making case interview estimations. The space available in an article like this does not allow for such a comprehensive treatment, though. Here we will simply go over some of the key points from that lesson. This should be enough to get you started on estimations, though you should go on to refer to the MCC Academy in future to get yourself fully up to scratch for your interview.
1. Target Group
These kinds of estimation questions all ask about entirely disparate matters of fact, but are often structurally quite similar. In particular, you will frequently be asked to find the size of some target group as a subset of a general population. In case studies, this will generally be to establish the size of a market in which we want to do business. Thus, asking questions as to how many pizzas a new restaurant in Rome will sell on day one, or how many cars are sold per year in Berlin are effectively asking us to work out what fraction of the general population will actually buy the products in question.
This kind of "market sizing" exercise is a recurring theme in consulting - and thus interview case studies - as firms will often need to establish the potential for profit in a particular marketplace before deciding whether to do business there.
In order to move from the total population to narrowing down the target group, we need to make assumptions about the kinds of people who will be buying (or selling - see next section) our product. For example, if we are answering the question about the Roman pizzeria, then we can assume that a certain fraction of people will be lactose or gluten intolerant - so won't be able to stomach pizza - whilst another fraction simply won't like pizza (inconceivable as it might seem...). Beyond that, if the restaurant is more expensive, a certain fraction of the population won't be able to afford to eat there. After that, we might assume that very young children and the very elderly probably won't be eating pizza. This iterative process is really an example of segmentation, which we have a full article on here and which we also discuss in the specific context of estimation below.
2. Demand side or supply side
Often, the same estimations can be approached in two distinct ways - each a kind of mirror image of the other. For instance, if one is trying to calculate the number of cars per year sold in Berlin, the natural course of action would probably be to consider the number of buyers, as we have done above. However, we might equally well consider the likely number of car dealerships and how many cars per year they sell to maintain their businesses. Thus, we can think about market size in terms of the activity of either buyers or providers. In effect, all this means that we might approach the same problem via two different target groups (buyer and providers).
Whether we take a demand or supply side approach will depend upon the specifics of the case in question. It might simply make more sense to focus on buyers or providers in some scenarios - especially where one grouping provides a more salient constraint on the value you wish to calculate - whilst you must also consider which best leverages the information you have available.
How do we move from the general population to our target group? Segmentation just means to iteratively subdividing a population until we have narrowed down to the segment in which we are actually interested.
Segmentation is fundamentally a process for moving from "big to small". We can attempt to do this all at once - and perhaps it might work out. However, it is far easier - and minimises the chance of you neglecting something important - to take an iterative approach to segmentation. Thus, for the example of our pizzeria, we should start off by identifying larger groups and then narrowing them down to smaller and smaller segments. One way of doing this is visualised nicely in the below Venn diagram.
Just as with choosing demand or supply side, the key to using segmentation in case studies is to choose the division most appropriate to answering the question in hand and which best leverages the information you have access to. For example, if you are trying to estimate the number of cars in Berlin, it is better to segment by age than by, say, sex. This is because we can rule out certain age groups (children and the very elderly) as not being drivers and thus not buying cars - whereas people of both sexes drive, so we do not gain anything from making that distinction. By contrast, if we were selling clothing or cosmetics, sex might be a highly relevant segmentation river.
When you segment, it is crucial that the divisions you make are MECE - that is, mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive. We have a whole article on the MECE rule, which you should read if you haven't already. In short, though, we need to make sure that each time we subdivide a group that no single element ends up in two subsets simultaneously (mutually exclusive) and that every element has a defined subset to which it belongs (collectively exhaustive).
Being MECE is necessary for a segmentation to be valid. However, just because a segmentation is valid does not mean that it will be useful. As we explain in the main MECE article, there will generally be an indefinite number of possible perfectly-valid segmentations for any sizeable population.
Of course, if you have read our other articles on this site, you will be familiar with our method for building problem driven structures. This kind of structure can be especially useful in cases involving estimation, as it builds in MECE segmentation and iterative narrowing of what we are focussing on whilst also making it easier for you to avoid missing anything or losing track of where you are.
Everything you need in one placeAll the most up-to-date resources delivered as a MBA course Learn more
For the question about estimating the Roman pizzeria's first day sales, we could build a structure as follows:
This kind of diagram is useful both to facilitate your own reasoning and to help your interviewer keep track of what you are up to. You don't need to use a tree structure to make a segmentation, but we strongly recommend that you do. This is as much for practical reasons as anything else. It is possible to segment using something like a Venn diagram or pie chart, where you progressively subdivide an area of your page which represents the general population. We showed a very neat one of these in the previous section. However, in a real interview, this kind of diagram would be more likely end up look something like the below (or worse!):
Obviously, this is a bit of a mess. Generally, any kind of Venn diagram or pie chart method means that you are working on a smaller and smaller area of paper as you approach the crucial end-point of your analysis. Your page becomes exponentially messier and more difficult to read, making it harder for your interviewer to follow along and more easy for you to get confused - as well as just making you look less-than-competent. One reason why the tree structure is so useful is precisely because the expanding front represented by the end branches means that the part of the diagram you are focussing on naturally expands to meet your needs, avoiding clutter and all the problems that come with it.
5. Calculate, Check and Improve
Once you have established your target group, decided whether you are going to work on the supply or demand side, have structured your approach and have followed through an appropriate segmentation, the calculations required to arrive at your final answer should be straightforward. In fact, it is arguable that if your estimation requires any great level of mathematical sophistication in the calculations then your approach has not been a sensible one (remember use our free mental math practice tool make sure your calculation skills are sharp!).
Getting your answer doesn't mean you are finished, though! An estimate is never going to be 100% correct. However, as always, we need to make sure what we have come up with is reasonable. As such, as soon as you have your answer, you should immediately conduct a quick "sense check" to make sure that the value you have arrived at is at least somewhat plausible. Thus, you should always ask yourself "is this answer reasonable?"
If the answer is obviously completely wrong, one likely reason for this is that one of your assumptions has been inappropriate. It may well be possible to tweak this assumption slightly and run the calculations again, though you might not have time to do so.
After the sense check, your final task is to suggest to your interviewer a few ways in which you could improve on your estimation. Obviously, this will be especially important if your current answer is plainly wrong and don't have time to re-run analysis. Even if your answer seems very much within the realms of reason, though, there is no estimation which cannot be improved and being able to suggest ways of doing this demonstrates your understanding of the process as a whole.
Your assumptions inherently involve simplification. As such, you can always make use of more sophisticated assumptions which simplify reality to a lesser degree. Similarly, any segmentation can be made more fine grained, yielding a more accurate estimation. For instance, if you segmented the population into 20-year age bands, you could switch to 10-year or 5-year bands to improve your estimate with a more fine-grained analysis.
Impress your interviewerWe teach you how to solve problems like them Work with us
This article should get you up to speed on what is expected from you when your interviewer gives you an estimation question.
In particular, we have learnt that we must give up any pre-existing impression that assumptions are inherently "bad". In short, in the real world, we need to make assumptions to get things done. In consulting, estimations are not ends in themselves, but are made to inform business decisions. The idea that estimations simply need to be "reasonable" and "good enough", rather than quantitatively perfect, reflects the general consulting mindset which we have discussed in other articles on this site. Thus, you should be bringing the general principles of the hypothesis driven approach and ideas like the 80/20 rule to estimation as much as you do to any other case study.
Whilst this article is sufficient to get you started on practicing simpler estimation cases from our case bank, the high likelihood of your being asked to make an estimation in your case interview means that you should be mastering this skill if you want to land an MBB job. Your best resource here is our full-length video lesson on estimation in the MCC Academy.
Find out more in our case interview course
Ditch outdated guides and misleading frameworks and join the MCC Academy, the first comprehensive case interview course that teaches you how consultants approach case studies.