Transparent by design
Salary data methodology
The methodology lives with the tracker so its evidence labels and estimates can be evaluated in the same place as the results.
The tracker separates observed base wages, interpolated base estimates, estimated bonuses, and modeled partner compensation. These are different evidence classes and should not be read as equally certain.
Source hierarchy
Sources are used in this order:
- Employer-submitted government records for role-, employer-, and location-specific base wages.
- Official institutional reports for broader recruiting-channel benchmarks such as MBA signing bonuses.
- Current title-level salary aggregators and attributable secondary analysis as directional cross-checks.
Secondary evidence does not silently overwrite a primary-source wage. When the two disagree, the tracker keeps the primary value and exposes the secondary source for review.
Canonical base-wage data
The canonical dataset is extracted from the US Department of Labor FY2026 Q1 LCA disclosure workbook. These employer submissions for H-1B, H-1B1, and E-3 cases include employer, job title, worksite, and wage fields. The Department of Labor disclosure archive and methodology provides coverage notes and record layouts.
A certified LCA determination is evidence that the employer filed that wage for that role and location. It does not prove that a candidate started work, that every employee at the level receives that amount, or that the range is a standard offer band. The filing also excludes signing bonuses, performance bonuses, and most benefits.
The current dataset covers McKinsey, BCG, Bain, Kearney, L.E.K., and Oliver Wyman records that could be mapped confidently to a general consulting career level. Practice-specific technical and actuarial titles are excluded from generalist comparisons unless the result explicitly identifies the practice.
How missing base wages are interpolated
When a firm has no matching primary record for a selected level, the tracker:
- takes the median lower and upper wage values from observed records at the same normalized level at other firms;
- constrains the estimate using the selected firm's nearest observed lower and upper levels, where available;
- rounds the result to the nearest $1,000; and
- labels it Interpolated base in the result and comparison table.
Interpolation makes gaps navigable; it does not manufacture an official firm figure. An interpolated result has a zero-record sample count and must not be described as a reported offer or employer pay band.
How base wages are cross-checked
Secondary checks are attached at record level where they are sufficiently specific. The MIT Sloan 2025–2026 MBA Employment Report, for example, provides an institutional benchmark for post-MBA consulting base salaries. Indeed and Glassdoor title pages are treated as directional checks because their populations, estimation methods, and title normalization can differ from federal filing data.
How bonuses are estimated
The tracker separates a one-time signing bonus from the recurring annual performance bonus. No bonus is presented as employer-filed or guaranteed.
For post-MBA consulting roles, three independent school reports provide the main anchor. Harvard Business School's Class of 2024 consulting data reports a $30,000 median signing bonus among recipients and a $40,000 median variable bonus among recipients. Yale SOM's 2025–2026 report and Michigan Ross's 2025 employment data independently report a $30,000 median signing bonus for consulting hires.
Those reports do not identify individual firms. Firm- and level-specific ranges are therefore modeled using the institutional anchors, adjacent-level progression, and current secondary compensation reports. The low end of a performance-bonus range may be zero because variable pay is discretionary. A displayed upper end is a strong-outcome or ceiling-style estimate, not an expected payout.
How partner compensation is estimated
Partner pay is not modeled as an ordinary employee salary plus bonus. Partnership remuneration commonly combines a fixed draw or guaranteed component with a much larger variable profit share. HMRC's partnership manual explains the underlying profit-share mechanics, while BCG UK LLP's 2025 accounts provide primary evidence of the partnership structure. Neither source provides an official US individual-partner pay band.
The tracker therefore uses deliberately wide modeled total-compensation ranges: $500,000 to $5 million-plus for MBB partners and $300,000 to $1.5 million-plus for the Tier 2 firms currently covered. These bands are cross-checked against a current former-consultant synthesis of anonymous salary data and industry estimates. The upper end represents senior equity-partner outcomes, not a typical newly promoted partner. Equity status, tenure, geography, book of business, firm profitability, and retirement arrangements can move actual compensation materially.
What the displayed total includes
For employee levels, estimated first-year cash equals displayed base wage plus estimated signing bonus plus estimated performance bonus. The signing payment is one-time, and the performance component is not guaranteed.
For partners, estimated total compensation equals modeled fixed or draw compensation plus modeled profit share. Benefits, retirement contributions, relocation payments, deferred compensation, taxes, and the value of firm investment opportunities are excluded.
Coverage and limitations
- The current firm-level finder covers the United States only.
- Government filings cover a specific visa-related population and are not a census of all employees or offers.
- Titles are normalized across firms, so equivalent levels may still differ in responsibility or required tenure.
- Bonuses can change with individual performance, firm performance, start date, and recruiting channel.
- Partner outcomes have the lowest certainty and intentionally use the widest ranges.
- Currency conversion alone does not make compensation packages across countries economically comparable.
Material source reviews are reflected in the page's review date. The tracker does not use private coaching or candidate-offer information as published evidence, and no independent reviewer is named because none was documented for this edition.
For broader context beyond the data, read the separate consulting salary article.